Tải bản đầy đủ

C6 sand control chapter

Designed & Presented by



Đỗ Quang Khánh – HoChiMinh City University of Technology
Email: dqkhanh@hcmut.edu.vn or doquangkhanh@yahoo.com


Content & Agenda


Causes and consequences of sand production

Sand Production Prediction

Sand control methods


Reservoir Stimulation, 3e – Economides & Nolte

Petroleum Production Systems - Economides et al., 1994

Production Operations: Well Completions, Workover, and Stimulation -Thomas O. Allen,
Alan P. Roberts,1984

o Why Sand Control?
 The production of formation sand with oil and/or gas creates a number of potentially
dangerous and costly problems
 Losses in production can occur as the result of sand partially filling up inside the wellbore.
 Creation of void and breakouts behind the casing, shale streaks remain unsupported and
creation a formation damage in the near wellbore region
 Sand & particles transported with fluids cause severe erosion damages, especially in gas wells
 If the flow velocities of the well cannot transport the produced sand to the surface, this
accumulation of sand may shut off production entirely.
 If shutoff occurs, the well must be circulated, or the sand in the casing must be bailed out
before production can resume
 Once produced sand is at the surface and no longer threatens to erode pipe or reduce
productivity, the problem of disposal remains. Sand disposal can be extremely costly,
particularly on offshore locations

When is Sand Control Required?


Sand grain slippage, collapse of the perforation tunnel, wellbore or cavity, resulting from:


A significant pressure gradient across the sandface. This can result from:


high drawdowns;
pressure depletion;
wellbore deviation;
pressure surges during rod pumping.
high fluid viscosities (>50 cp,), especially in heavy oil wells where viscosities may exceed 1000 cp;
turbulence in the pore throats in gas wells and high-rate or high gas-liquid ratio (GLR) oil wells;
formation damage and plugging of perforations and pore throat areas.

Increasing water saturation and water cuts, which destabilize the sand as a result of:

reduction in the cohesive strength and inter-granular friction
mobilization of the fines from around the grain-to-grain contacts
chemical reaction with the natural cementing materials, especially if salinity changes occur with water
operators increasing the gross production rate and draw-down to compensate for decreasing relative
permeability to oil and oil production volumes
increasing drag forces on the grains due to movement of the wetting phase (i.e., the connate water)

Sand production is initiated when the forces acting to dislodge sand grains from the formation
exceed the strength of the rock
 Dislodging forces included mechanical stresses in the rock and the drag forces associated
with fluid flow

Pore pressure relieves frictional forces

Production of wetting phase reduces capillary pressure forces

Resisting forces include rock strength parameters and capillary pressure forces
Intergranular frictional forces and bonding (cementation) help resist grain movement
Capillary Pressure adds further grain-to-grain bonding

Sand production is initiated when the forces acting to dislodge sand grains from the formation
exceed the strength of the rock
 Dislodging forces included mechanical stresses in the rock and the drag forces associated
with fluid flow

Pore pressure relieves frictional forces

Production of wetting phase reduces capillary pressure forces
 Resisting forces include rock strength parameters and capillary pressure forces

Intergranular frictional forces and bonding (cementation) help resist grain movement

Capillary Pressure adds further grain-to-grain bonding

Sand Production May Begin Late in the Life of a Well
Pressure pulses caused by non-steady production
Increasing mechanical stresses caused by pore pressure reduction
Increased drawdown leads to increased drag forces
Water breakthrough can severely reduce capillary pressure forces

 Accumulation in surface equipment
– Increased maintenance costs
– Costs associated with deferred production
 Accumulation downhole
– Frequent clean-out trips
– Decreased productivity
 Erosion of downhole and surface equipment
– Frequent workovers
 Formation collapse and casing damage
– Loss of well


Sand Production Prediction
Determine which wells have the potential for sand production
Determine best time to institute sand control methods
Assess economic impact (both positive and negative) of incorporating sand control
Probability of Successful Sand Production Prediction

Typically good prediction in “definitely will” or “definitely will not” fail categories
Majority of the wells and reservoirs fall in between these two extremes
Marginal formations difficult to accurately predict
Multi-phase fluid flow is a complicating factor
Effects of changing production character difficult to predict

Sand Prediction and Sand Control

Most authorities recommend that sand control techniques be applied immediately upon indication that a formation
will produce sand.
This practice will allow the highest success rate and the lowest production loss possible after sand control is
Laboratory studies have shown that once an unconsolidated sand is disturbed, the sand cannot be packed back to
its original permeability.
Sand control should be applied before the reservoir rock is seriously disturbed by sand production.

The factors tending to prevent sand production

The amount, strength, and nature of the rock cementation.


The shape and arrangement of the sand grains, which will determine the inter-

granular friction.

The degree of compaction, which is generally proportional to the overburden
loading (or depth) and inversely proportional to the initial reservoir pressure.


The behavior of the rock after initial failure in terms of:
 plastic deformation of the cavity wall;
 natural arching of the unconsolidated or failed sand around the perforation tunnel.

Sand Failure
Geological Age
Formation Depth
Depositional Environment
Fluid type
Primary cementation

Miocene to present
<8,000 ft
High water saturation

Rate Control and Arching Effects
 A consideration of the mechanisms of sand failure should
make it apparent that reducing the rate and drawdown should
reduce sand influx

Rate control is therefore only a temporary sand control method

Selective Perforation
 Identify the potential sand-producing zones from log
 As a rough rule of thumb, many completion engineers often
use a sonic log threshold of 100 µs/ft (325 µs/m) for

identifying potential sand-producing intervals.

 Formation Sand Characterisation

Sand sampling is critical to any type of sand control technique

Representative of the entire interval under consideration
 Analysis to be performed:
– Sieve Analysis (most used)
– Laser Light Scattering (grain size underestimation)
– Clay Content
– Acid Solubility
– Fluid Compatibility
– Porosity and Permeability
– Wettability
Types of formation sand samples: Drill cuttings, Produced samples, Bailed samples, Sidewall core samples,
Conventional core samples

Sample size and frequency
– Minimum sample size is 15 cubic centimeters
– Samples required every 2 to 3 feet or at every lithology change

Sieve Analysis

Sieve Analysis Apparatus
Laboratory technique to determine grain size and size distribution of a sand sample
Consists of a series of wire mesh sieves with progressively smaller openings
Sieves are stacked and shaken or vibrated to separate sand grains according to size

Sieve Analysis
Sand sample must be cleaned to remove all mud, fines (clays) and cementation material
Sand sample must be broken down to individual grains for accurate results
Samples must be sieved long enough to allow complete separation of various grain sizes

U.S. Mesh

U.S. Mesh Definition of Grain Size
Mesh refers to the number of openings per linear inch
The width of the opening depends on the mesh and diameter of the wire
The U.S. Mesh series specifies the mesh size and width of opening

Sieve Analysis Sizes

U.S. Mesh

Sieve Analysis Procedure
Sieves are weighed before and after sieving to determine weight of sample retained by each sieve
Grain size versus cumulative weight percent can be plotted on semi-log coordinates to obtain grain
size distribution

Grain Size Distribution Plot & Sand Classification

Sieve Analysis Indicates Uni. & Non-Uniform

Uniformity Coefficient


Sand Control Techniques
 Passive approaches
– Maintenance and workover
– Rate exclusion
– Selective completion practices
 Active approaches
– Plastic chemical consolidation
– Resin coated gravel
– Slotted liners or stand alone screens (without gravel packing)
– Expandable screens
– Gravel packing

Maintenance and Workover
Maintenance and Workover

Requires bailing, washing and cleaning of surface facilities to remove formation sand

Used when:
– Sand production is limited
– Production rates are low
– Well intervention risk is low
– Cost of more proactive sand control technique is not economically justified

Rate Exclusion or Production Restriction
 Rate Exclusion or Production Restriction
Reduction in prod. rate will reduce drag forces and drawdown to provide reduced risk of sand production
– Slowly increase rate until sand production begins to increase (Critical Drawdown)
– Sequentially reduce flow rate until the sand production declines to an acceptable level
Attempting to establish maximum flow rate in conjunction with stable arch

Horizontal Wells???

The reduced production rate that excludes formation production sand is not profitable.
Production rate is not always the only factor contributing to sand production.
The degree of consolidation of the formation, the type and amount of cementitious material present, and
the amount of water being produced are also significant contributing factors to sand production.
These other factors may allow a well to produce sand even after the production rate has been severely

Selective Completion Practices
Selective Completion Practices

Perforate or complete only high strength layers

Perforate at high shot density

Need good hydraulic communication

Poor sweep efficiency

Risk to leave reserves unrecovered

Plastic Consolidation
 Plastic Consolidation
Goal is to inject plastic resins into the formation to provide increased compressive strength while
maintaining acceptable permeability

Treatment objective are:
– Cover entire perforated interval
– Coat all sand grains with resin
– Concentrate resin at contact points
– Leave pore spaces open
Three types of resins systems available:
– Epoxies
– Furans (and furan/phenolic blends)
– Phenolics

Plastic Consolidation

Plastic Consolidation Placement Technique

Verify rock wettability
Pump a preflush treatment to restore water wettability
Pump the treatment inside the formation
Wait for rock grains coating
Flush back the excess treatment fluids

Pros and Cons of Plastic Consolidation Treatments

Plastic Consolidation
 Resin Coated Gravel
Resin coated gravel or gravel mixed in a resin carrier fluid is pumped to fill voids behind casing and
perforation tunnels
Resin is allowed to consolidate
Casing is drilled out to leave wellbore unobstructed
 Resin Coated Gravel Limitations
Must have complete coverage of perforated interval to be successful
Good compressive strength of resin coated gravel requires high temperature (>300ºF)
May reduce near-wellbore permeability
Long term reliability
 Resin Coated Gravel Screenless Frac-Pack
Similar to resin coated gravel treatment, but gravel placed above fracture pressure
Gravel is underflushed at end of fracture job and allowed to cure
Casing is drilled out to leave wellbore unobstructed

Tài liệu bạn tìm kiếm đã sẵn sàng tải về

Tải bản đầy đủ ngay